Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Dome et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Monroe Lavard Davis
Defendant:
Michael Dome, Patrick S. Muldowney, University of Texas Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 23-3097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant / Appellee:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Taylor v. AbbVie Inc.
as 23-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE WILLIAM TAYLOR, a/k/a Tad Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
ABBOTT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and ABBVIE INC.
Parmeley v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00605
Defendant:
Allergan, PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 4:2022cv40047
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10430
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, et al.
as 9:2022cv80149
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bobbitt
Defendant:
Zantac, Sanofi Pharma, Co., Walgreens Pharmacy Services, Cermack Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 3:2021cv50387
Plaintiff:
Jarad W. Williams and Fluff Daddy
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
