Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Freemanvibe et al v. Valley Arts and Science Academy et al
as 1:2012cv01727
Plaintiff:
Indigo Freemanvibe and Minor Child J.F.
Defendant:
Valley Arts and Science Academy, Christina Soto, Sandy Fuerte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOD v. MAIN et al
as 1:2011cv06325
Petitioner:
PHILLIP WOOD
Respondent:
JOHN E. MAIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Williams, et al v. FDIC
as 11-35812
Plaintiff:
DAVID M WILLIAMS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS HUTTON, An Individual, MARK HETTEL, An Individual, RON LOWERY, An Individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, and as in its corporate capacity
Phillip Wood v. John Main
as 11-2684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MAIN, C.E.O.
WOOD v. MAIN
as 1:2010cv02460
Petitioner:
PHILLIP WOOD
Respondent:
JOHN E. MAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD v. MAIN
as 1:2010cv02075
Petitioner:
PHILLIP WOOD
Respondent:
JOHN E. MAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INMATE LEGAL ASSOCIATION INC et al
as 3:2010cv01041
Plaintiff:
INMATE LEGAL ASSOCIATION INC, RA'ZULU UKAWABUTU, EDWARD GRIMES and others
Defendant:
MICHELLE RICCI, MICHELLE RICCI, WILLIAM MOLIENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Wood
as 6:2009cv03351
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip Wood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Phillip Wood v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ and MICHELLE R. RICCI
WOOD v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2008cv04797
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, LUCAMICA GLAZEMAN, DEFILLIPPO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
