Cases 41 - 50 of 3,512
Cathey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Eric Cathey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Audrey E. Downs
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillispie v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jermuriel Gillispie
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shaffer
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Lakshmi Narayan Hospitality Group Louisville, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Maria Antonia Jimenez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lakshmi Narayan Hospitality Group Louisville, LLC, Judge Claria Horn Boom, Robert Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Derwin Valentino Thomas
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutshaw, et al v. Barry, County of, et al
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Phillip J Cutshaw
Defendant:
Barry County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Livonia, City of v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv10788
Plaintiff:
Livonia, City of
Defendant:
Justin Jarvis-Jerome Phillips
Cortez et al v. Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cortez and Phillip Matoy
Defendant:
Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
