Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NH Lottery Commission, et al v. Barr, et al
as 19-1835
Interested Party:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, acting by and through, Department of Revenue, Secretary C. Daniel Hassell, and Bureau of Lottery, COALITION TO STOP INTERNET GAMBLING and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NEOPOLLARD INTERACTIVE LLC, NH LOTTERY COMMISSION and POLLARD BANKNOTE LIMITED
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Nanografix Corporation v. Pollard Banknote Limited
as 5:2019cv10624
Plaintiff:
Nanografix Corporation
Defendant:
Pollard Banknote Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
NH Lottery Commission v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv00163
Defendant:
US Attorney General and US Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
NH Lottery Commission
Amicus Curiae:
The Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling, State of New Jersey, The National Association of Convenience Stores and others
Consolidated Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Pollard Banknote Limited and NeoPollard Interactive LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NeoPollard Interactive LLC et al v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
Pollard Banknote Limited and NeoPollard Interactive LLC
Defendant:
USA, US Attorney General and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Nanografix Corporation v. Pollard Banknote Limited
as 2:2018cv06735
Plaintiff:
Nanografix Corporation
Defendant:
Pollard Banknote Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pollard Banknote Limited Partnership v. Loveland Machines Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00418
Plaintiff:
Pollard Banknote Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Loveland Machines Inc. and John Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pollard Banknote Limited Partnership v. Scientific Games International, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00621
Plaintiff:
Pollard Banknote Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Scientific Games International, Inc., Scientific Games Corp. and Oberthur Gaming Technologies, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
