Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Rich v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Rich, III
Defendant:
United States of America
JONES et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
ALEX JONES, ALICIA GILLEN, ALYSON MCGILL and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PRINCE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
STEVIE PRINCE, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hannah v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03112
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Hannah
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WONG et al v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. WONG and SUSAN H. WONG
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JAMES JOHN WINIARSKI, S. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wendt et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03047
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Samuel Clement Wendt, Brandon S. Goins and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Dawn Prince
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Prince v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Johnny Prince
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
