Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Consumer Legal Group P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Chance Wilson
Defendant:
Consumer Legal Group P.C. and Phoenix Debt Pros, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wilson v. Consumer Legal Group P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Chance Wilson
Defendant:
Consumer Legal Group P.C. and Phoenix Debt Pros, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vivint Inc et al v. Sunrun Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Vivint Inc, Vivant Smart Home Inc. and Smart Home Pros Inc.
Defendant:
Sunrun Inc, Bradley Rossiter, Zackary Andersen and others
ManaMed, LLC v. Motion Medical Pro, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
ManaMed, LLC
Defendant:
Motion Medical Pro, Inc., Aces High Ortho, Inc. and Scott Holdsworth
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Export Pro Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Export Pro Inc., Ricardo Masso and Export Pro Inc. doing business as The Dive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Slaughter v. Bass Pro, Inc.
as 6:2022cv03174
Plaintiff:
Kent Slaughter
Defendant:
Bass Pro, Inc., BPS Direct, LLC, Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Val-Pro, Inc. v. Midtown Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09667
Defendant:
Jaey Y. Chung, Midtown Mart, Inc., Yeon Min Chung and others
Plaintiff:
Val-Pro, Inc. doing business as Valley Fruit & Produce Co. and Val-Pro, Inc. a corporation doing business as Valley Fruit and Produce Co.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
