Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(HC) Alvarez v. Arviza
as 1:2023cv00524
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Alvarez
Respondent:
Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alvarez v. Briarcliff Bus Company,Inc. et al
as 7:2018cv12379
Defendant:
Briarcliff Bus Company, John Borho and Briarcliff Bus Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pablo Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez et al v. Centraarchy Restaurant Management Company
as 2:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Alvarez , William Askins , Rachel Brown and others
Defendant:
Centraarchy Restaurant Management Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Park v. FDM Group, Inc.
as 17-1030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grace Park, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ping Lin, Ramin Shirvani and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FDM (Holdings) PLC and FDM Group, Inc.
Jeffory Weaver et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Zeigler, Michael Herczeg, Thomas E Streeter and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
USA v. Pablo Alvarez
as 14-50506
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PABLO ALVAREZ
Abarca, et. al. vs. Merck & Co., et.al.
as 1:2007cv00388
Defendant:
County of Merced, Ranchwood Properties, Ranchwood Homes Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Gonzales, Kerman Eddings, Donna Simmons and others
Special Master:
Judge John K. Trotter and Judge Edward A. Panelli
3Rd Party Defendant:
State of California Department of Water Resources
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
USA v. Juan Alvarez-Pichardo
as 12-50590
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN PABLO ALVAREZ-PICHARDO, also known as John Paul Alvarez
USA v. Pablo Alvarez-Tellez
as 11-10401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PABLO ALVAREZ-TELLERZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
