Cases
Wilkerson v. Butler et al
as 4:2017cv00690
Plaintiff: Rodney Ray Wilkerson
Defendant: Pam Butler, Annette Manning, Terry Surles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Conti et al
as 1:2014cv09345
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Joy Flowers Conti, Attorney General of the United States, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00193
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Pam Butler, Drew Scarsborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv00238
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: M. Pugh, United States Marshal, Pam Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. PUGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00119
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: M. PUGH, CCA (CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA), NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Scarsborough et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00170
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Drew Scarsborough, Frank DeClair, Doug LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 1:2013cv00142
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: M. Pugh, CCA (Corrections Corporation of America), Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In Re: Diet Drugs, et al, et al
as 08-2386
Plaintiff: JOINT FEE APPLICANTS
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHARLES R. PARKER, Esq., CLASS COUNSEL, JOINT FEE APPLICANTS and others
Defendant - Appellant: ELIZABETH BERZINSKY, RONALD WEINTRAUB, SHERRIE D. WIENEKE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?