Cases 51 - 60 of 218
Reid v. Rohoho Inc
as 2:2021cv03604
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reid
Defendant:
Rohoho Inc doing business as Papa Johns Pizza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cesky v. Bam Bam Pizza, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
Troy Cesky
Defendant:
Bam Bam Pizza, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Papa Johns Pizza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rebecka Ditsworth v. P & Z Carolina Pizza, LLC, et al
as 21-5755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECKA DITSWORTH, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellee:
P & Z CAROLINA PIZZA, LLC, dba Papa Johns, CHARLES H. ZOELLERS and DANIEL B. PATTERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Barberi v. Pizzerias LLC et al
as 1:2021cv21958
Defendant:
ROSCHMAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP NO. 1 LTD. and Pizzerias LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as PAPA JOHNS 1157
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Kevin S. Davis v. Papa John's USA, Inc., et al
as 21-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN S. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CASSIDY WHEELER, J.J., PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA and others
Swint v. Lord Baltimore Company et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Defendant:
John Edwards, Papa Johns Pizza, Lord Baltimore Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Swint and Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lackey v. PJ Food Service, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01384
Defendant:
Papa John's Food Service and PJ Food Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Damion Lackey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Terrance Webb v. Equal Employment Opportunity, et al
as 20-14722
Defendant / Appellee:
PAPA JOHNS, DOORDASH, PIZZA HUT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE LANDELL WEBB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
