Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Spurlock v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Lyman Spurlock
Defendant:
Benjamin, Parole Officer and E Squad Officer
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
Benjamin, Parole Officer, Officer and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAIFA v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv02198
Plaintiff:
KATAZA TAIFA
Defendant:
CURRENT PAROLE OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICE SUPERVISOR and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHERSON v. PAROLE OFFICE OF VIGO COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
TAVARES HUTCHERSON
Defendant:
PAROLE BOARD, DIV 1 COURT VIGO COUNTY and PAROLE OFFICE OF VIGO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. OFFICER
as 1:2012cv00297
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DENNIS
Respondent:
PAROLE OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. EVANSVILLE PAROLE OFFICE
as 1:2011cv01084
Respondent:
EVANSVILLE PAROLE OFFICE
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEPHENSON v. MORGAN et al
as 4:2010cv00134
Defendant:
PAROLE OFFICER HEATHER ABSHIRE, PAROLE OFFICER BRIAN MORGAN, PAROLE OFFICER CRYSTAL SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pizano v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Alvino Pizano
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Porter County of, Indiana Dept of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
