Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Terry v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Steven Terry
Defendant:
Justice Sharon L. Kennedy, Justice Patrick F. Fischer, Justice Patrick DeWine and others
BURRESS-EL v. DUKE ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN BURRESS-EL
Defendant:
ROCCO O. D'ASENZO, BOB MCMAHON, LARISA M. VAYSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tingler v. Deters et al
as 2:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Charles Tingler
Defendant:
Justice Joseph Deters, Justice Jennifer Brunner, Justice Melody Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pelmear et al v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2018cv01480
Defendant:
Kenny Cowell, Reminger Co. LPA, Ed Leininger and others
Plaintiff:
Noah-Wade Pelmear and Douglas-Alan Pelmear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mc Daniels, Sr. v. Barnes
as 3:2013cv02804
Petitioner:
Patrick Dewin Mc Daniels, Sr.
Respondent:
Ron Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Dewine et al
as 1:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dawone Carr
Defendant:
Patrick Dewine, Massimino M. Ionna, Timothy J. McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinkle v. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2008cv00240
Plaintiff:
Stacy Hinkle, Stacy Hinkle and Stacy Hinkle
Defendant:
Hamilton County Board of Commissioners, David Pepper, Todd Portune and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
