Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21536
Plaintiff: PATRICK HOLMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16002
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: PATRICK HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. STATE OF INDIANA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00847
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner: PATRICK HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick Holmes v. Candie Hubbard, et al
as 19-2458
Defendant / Appellee: TERILEE THOMAS, CANDIE HUBBARD, HEATHER SIMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRICK HOLMES
Holmes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00311
Defendant: Davol, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patrick Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
as 3:2018cv00195
Respondent: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Petitioner: PATRICK HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLMES v. COSLER et al
as 3:2018cv00118
Defendant: ROBERT FAULKNER and ROBERT COSLER
Plaintiff: PATRICK HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. HUBBARD et al
as 3:2018cv00093
Miscellaneou: BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: PATRICK HOLMES
Defendant: CANDIE HUBBARD, HEATHER SIMS, TERILEE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. MISSISSIPPI DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2018cv00067
Miscellaneou: BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: PATRICK HOLMES
Respondent: MISSISSIPPI DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Estate of George Steward et al v. McCay et al
as 5:2015cv00653
Plaintiff: The Estate of George Steward , Ted Agee and Christie Oakley
Defendant: Andrew McCay , Wayne Anderton , Jimmie Halbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?