Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Arnold v. Texas Board of Pardons & Parole
as 1:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Wilson
as 4:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Defendant:
Sharon Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv00429
Plaintiff:
Frank Nunez Garcia
Defendant:
The Watchtower, Unidentified Prisoners, NFN Tesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. State of Florida
as 3:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ARNOLD v. HUNT et al
as 1:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL ARNOLD
Defendant:
Deborah S. Hunt, KEN LOOMIS and LEON T. KOROTKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARNOLD v. HUNT et al
as 2:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL ARNOLD
Defendant:
DEBORAH S. HUNT, LEON T. KOROTKO and KEN LOOMIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Contreras #043464 v. Tesch et al
as 2:2014cv02650
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nunez Contreras, II
Defendant:
Unknown Tesch, Paul Arnold Tatz, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Arnold v. MI Dept of Human Services, et al
as 14-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PAUL ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Schoolcraft County, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Delta County, DELTA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Arnold v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2014cv01378
Petitioner:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
