Cases 1 - 10 of 36
(PC) Phelps v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Paul Phelps
Defendant:
Manuel Perez, CPL Townsend, Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Phelps v. Perez et al
as 1:2021cv01108
Plaintiff:
Paul Phelps
Defendant:
Manuel Perez, Townsend and Bettes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. State of New York et al
as 9:2018cv00316
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Paul Phelps, OPH, Sai Gandham, OPH and others
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01523
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Paul Phelps, OPH, Sai Gandham, OPH and others
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Taylor v. Republic Services Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles Taylor , Richard LaBryer , Michael Small and others
Defendant:
Republic Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Lakeisha Adams v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-31004
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAKEISHA SHANAE ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Darius Patterson v. Steve Rader, Warden
as 14-30747
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARIUS PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kimberlin Edwards v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-30733
Petitioner - Appellant:
KIMBERLIN EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Richard Miller v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 14-30441
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD NATHANIEL MILLER, also known as Richard J. Miller
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C. PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
