Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cotto, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff:
STACY FOSTER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMIE KIMBALL, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN RILEY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General, TIMOTHY SHUGRUE, Berkshire County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fields et al v. Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives et al
as 1:2016cv01764
Plaintiff:
Brian Fields , Paul Tucker , Deana Weaver and others
Defendant:
Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives , Parliamentarian of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Representatives For Pennsylvania House Districts 92, 95, 97, 193, and 196
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kindle v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Rogers County et al
as 4:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Brian Kindle
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Rogers County, Scott Walton, John Sappington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coles v. Sierra, Jr. et al
as 1:2011cv11330
Plaintiff:
Heather Coles
Defendant:
Joseph Sierra, Jr. , Robert Cunningham , Paul Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TUCKER v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv02812
Plaintiff:
PAUL TUCKER
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , SEPTA POLICE OFFICER BERVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAUL TUCKER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
