Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Webb v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Paul Webb
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Webb v. Assurant, Inc. et al.
as 6:2014cv01289
Plaintiff:
Paul Webb
Defendant:
Assurant, Inc. and Timothy Potochnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2014cv01323
Plaintiff:
Paul Webb
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Florida Recovery Credit Services L.L.C. et al
as 2:2013cv01206
Plaintiff:
Danielle McGowan
Defendant:
Florida Recovery Credit Services L.L.C., Franklin Ross and Associates, Jay Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Paul Webb v. Celotex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72937
Plaintiff:
Paul Webb
Defendant:
Celotex Corporation
Aura Rossi v. City of Lakewood, et al
as 08-35972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AURA ROSSI
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAKEWOOD, HEIDI WACHTER, City Attorney, LAKEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT, also known as Lakewood Fire District 2 and others
Rossi v. City of Lakewood et al
as 3:2008cv05244
Plaintiff:
Aura Rossi
Defendant:
City of Lakewood, Andrew Neiditz, David Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rossi v. Lakewood City of et al
as 3:2007cv05411
Plaintiff:
Aura Rossi
Defendant:
Lakewood City of, Andrew Neiditz, David Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWMAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64534
Plaintiff:
CLYDE BOWMAN, HENRY ERNEST, RAY HANEY and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., UNITED STATES GYPSUM, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
