Cases 1 - 10 of 354
Williams v. Jacobs Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Paul Williams
Defendant:
Giant Bicycle Inc., Giant Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 24-3052
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW AARON ESCALANTE
Defendant:
PAUL WILLIAM BURMASTER
Lee v. Cheeseman et al
as 0:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Amazshea Lee
Defendant:
Paul William Cheeseman and Cheeseman Coaches, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 24-3010
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW AARON ESCALANTE
Defendant:
PAUL WILLIAM BURMASTER
Robison v. Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Paul William Robison
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P., Mesilla Valley Transportation Solutions, LLC and Richard Larez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Kirst v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Paul William Kirst
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 2:2023cv02559
Defendant:
Paul William Burmaster and Paul Will Burmaster
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
PAUL WILLIAMS, HEATHER WILLIAMS and HIDDEN CREEK FARMS & TRANSPORT LLC
Defendant:
BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE DAVIS and JAYME KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 2:2023cv02471
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Defendant:
Paul William Burmaster
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 23-6177
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAMS, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
