Cases 1 - 8 of 8
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company v. NCD Pedo, PA et al
as 4:2020cv01087
Plaintiff:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
NCD Pedo, PA, NCDWK, PA and Joseph Anthony Bonola, D.D.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EZ Pedo, Inc. v. Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.
as 18-15806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZ PEDO, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC., a Minnesota corporation, DBA Kinder Krowns
EZ Pedo, Inc. v. Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
EZ Pedo, Inc.
Defendant:
Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05443
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EZ Pedo, Inc. et al v. Cad Blu, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00971
Plaintiff:
EZ Pedo, Inc. and John P. Hansen
Defendant:
Cad Blu, Inc. and Rich Motto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner Grain Merchandising Inc et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Turner Grain Merchandising Inc , Turner Commodities Inc , Gerald Loyd and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc , Bayer Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Riceland Foods Inc
Cross_defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer BioScience NV, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner Grain Merchandising Inc et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 2:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Turner Grain Merchandising Inc , Turner Commodities Inc , Gerald Loyd and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc , Bayer Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Riceland Foods Inc
Cross_defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer BioScience NV, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
