Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(DP)(HC) Rangel v. Davis
as 1:2018cv01713
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Pedro Rangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(DP)(HC) Rangel v. Davis
as 2:2018cv03204
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Pedro Rangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Francisco Rangel Gonzalez
as 16-20502
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO PEDRO RANGEL GONZALEZ, also known as Fransicso Rangel-Gonzales, also known as Frankie Rangel, also known as Fray Pedro Gonzalez
Rangel et al v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00657
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rangel and Guadalupe Rangel
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Michael Stull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rangel et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv02750
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rangel and Pedro Rangel, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Officer N. Chapello, Chicago Police Officer M. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaime Gaytan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-3040
Petitioner:
JAIME DANIEL GAYTAN, aka Jaime Daniel Gaytan Villanueva, aka Jose Pedro Sandoval, aka Jaime Daniel Gayton, aka Pedro Delira-Rangel, aka Pedro Rangel Lira
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
