Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rudasill et al v. Swiss Re American Holding Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv01403
Plaintiff: Nia Rudasill, Eileen Gillis, Michael Schlem and others
Defendant: Swiss Re American Holding Corporation, Board of Directors of the Swiss Re American Holding Corporation, Philip K. Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
OKLA v. THE BMW PENSION PLAN et al
as 2:2019cv09158
Plaintiff: GARY OKLA
Defendant: BMW PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE and THE BMW PENSION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Connecticut Ironworkers Employ v. New England Regional Council
as 18-1830
Plaintiff: Pension Fund, Sheet metal workers local No 40, ERISA and Pension Plan Committee, Iron Workers' Local Nos 15 & 424,
Plaintiff - Appellant: Connecticut Ironworkers Employers Association, Inc., CT corp & assoc of employers, Associated Sheet Metal & Roofing Contractors, of CT Inc CT corp & assoc of employers, MRS Ent., Inc, CT corp and others
Defendant - Appellee: New England Regional Council of Carpenters
SNYDER et al v. HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00960
Plaintiff: KAREN SNYDER , CHERYL ROBINSON-KELLY , BARBARA FREDERICI and others
Defendant: HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM, THE HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Carol Innes v. Barclays Bank PLC USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1196
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAROL FORESTER INNES
Defendant - Appellee: BARCLAYS BANK PLC USA STAFF PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE
Kelly v. Stanadyne Automotive Corp.
as 16-3784
Plaintiff - Appellee: William Kelly
Defendant: Stanadyne Automotive Corp.
Defendant - Appellant: Retirement Plan Committee, AKA SC Pension Plan Committee, AKA Stanadyne Pension Committee, AKA Stanadyne Retirement Benefits Committee
BARKER et al v. ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02748
Plaintiff: MARY LYNNE BARKER , ANNE MARIE DALIO and DOROTHY FLAR
Defendant: ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. , ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER , THE ST. JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE and others
Movant: DONNA GARBACCIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Connecticut Ironworkers Employ v. New England Regional Council We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-485
Plaintiff: Pension Fund, Sheet metal workers local No 40, ERISA and Pension Plan Committee, Iron Workers' Local Nos 15 & 424,
Plaintiff - Appellant: Connecticut Ironworkers Employers Association, Inc., CT corp & assoc of employers, MRS Ent., Inc, CT corp, Barrett, Inc., CT corp and others
Defendant - Appellee: New England Regional Council of Carpenters
Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3457
Plaintiff - Appellant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, as Administrator of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota Pension Equity Plan, Supplemental Benefit Committee of the International Truck and Engine Corp. Retiree Supplemental Benefit Trust, as Administrator of the International Truck and Engine Corp. Retiree Supplemental Benefit Trust, Meijer, Inc., as Administrator of the Meijer OMP Pension Plan and Meijer Hourly Pension Plan, Participants in the Meijer Master Pension Trust and others
Plaintiff: CentraCare Health System, on Behalf of Itself and the Sisters of the Order of Saint Benedict Retirement Plan, Jerome Foundation, North Memorial Health Care, on Behalf of Itself and as Administrator of the North Memorial Health Care Pension Plan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
McPherson v. SGC Associates' Pension Plan et al
as 3:2014cv00323
Defendant: SGC Associates' Pension Plan, Lear Siegler Pension Plan, JP Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Plaintiff: David L. McPherson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?