Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Vandenboom et al v. Sanford et al
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Eugene Vandenboom, James H. Vandenboom and Francis Vandenboom
Defendant:
Cody A. Sanford, New Bern Transport Corporation, Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hurt v. PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael C Hurt
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc. and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Woods v. Pepsico, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Woods
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc., Bottling Group, LLC and Bottling Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
King v. PepsiCo Inc
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Tyrell King
Defendant:
PepsiCo Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Irving-Millentree v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Robney Irving-Millentree
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Boone v. Pepsico, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robin Boone
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc., THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY and Quaker Oats Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Rowan v. PepsiCo Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00911
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Rowan
Defendant:
PepsiCo Inc, New Bern Transportation Corporation and Bryson Juriel Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rolf v. PepsiCo
as 4:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamar Rolf, Sr.
Defendant:
PepsiCo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
