Cases 1 - 10 of 978
Evans #078208 v. Thornhill-Garrison et al
as 2:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Ira Deland Evans
Defendant:
Julynne Thornhill-Garrison, Eve Kelemen and Unknown Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Macias et al
as 4:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Avaro Covarrubias Perez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Macias, Correctional Officer L.Lopez, C. Koening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CARGILL MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED, GOOD SOURCE SOLUTIONS and others
Interested Party:
GLENN ANDREW SCUTERI, TIFFANY ROSE SCUTERI and TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
Perez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ometrius Perez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Connecticut Department of Correction, Colleen Gallager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarran v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Johan Perez Albarran
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Luis S. Perez
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Flores v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez-Flores
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correcional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jose L Perez
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ettienne-Modeste Jr., Dexter v. Pallacios et al
as 1:2024cv21048
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne-Modeste Jr.
Defendant:
Pallacios, John Doe, J. Loza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
