Cases 21 - 30 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Perez v. Huneycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez
Defendant:
FNU Huneycutt and Facility Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00661
Petitioner:
LUIS A. PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Flores-Espinoza v. Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Flores-Espinoza
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc. and Bernardo Perez
RODRIGUEZ PEREZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ and LUIS A. PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
USA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pen-Tech Associates, Inc. v. Kang et al
as 5:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Kang, Michael Kim, The Game Lab, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Perez v. Huneycutt, et al
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez
Defendant:
FNU Huneycutt, FNU Dye, FNU Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Colbert
as 5:2022hc02090
Petitioner:
Gabriel Perez
Respondent:
D Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Movement Mortgage LLC et al v. Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage LLC, Justin Wiesert, Isaac Alexander and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
Perez v. Ginkens et al
as 3:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
William Ginkens and FNU O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
