Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Peter Gakuba v. April
as 23-2303
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
APRIL, Customer Service, USPS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gakuba v. Franklin et al
as 1:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Dante Franklin, Faith Leach, Erika Isler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peter Gakuba v. Branden Maher, et al
as 22-3267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDEN A. MAHER, ROBIN BACH and THOMAS A. KLEIN
Gakuba v. April et al
as 1:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
April, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Peter Gakuba v. Branden Maher, et al
as 22-2185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDEN A. MAHER, ROBIN BACH and THOMAS A. KLEIN
Peter Gakuba v. Branden Maher, et al
as 22-1537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDEN A. MAHER, ROBIN BACH and THOMAS A. KLEIN
Peter Gakuba v. Branden Maher, et al
as 22-1506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDEN A. MAHER, 17th Cir. Ct. Judge, ROBIN BACH, Sup. Counter Clerks, 17th Cir. Ct. and THOMAS A. KLEIN, elected Court Clerk, 17th Cir. Ct.
Gakuba v. Hollywood Video, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Hollywood Video, Inc., Illinois Attorney General and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gakuba v. Hollywood Video LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Hollywood Video LLC, Eric Holder and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gakuba v. Amazon.com LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Amazon.com LLC , Eric Holder and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
