Cases 1 - 10 of 608
Updike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Peter F Updike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Peter John Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romanyk v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Romanyk
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cilluffo III v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11026
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Cilluffo III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Audrey Peters v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02895
Plaintiff:
Audrey Peters
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cila v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05255
Plaintiff:
Peter Cila
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Joshua v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joshua Peter Gonzales
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Tanonia Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peters v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Randy S. Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peters v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
