Cases 21 - 30 of 1,786
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Proctor v. Vican et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Ronald E. Vican, Mark Peter Pazauhanich, Donald Fernbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, AMY BONCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARDWELL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SAUERS v. OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT et al
as 2:2023cv05146
Plaintiff:
PETER SAUERS
Defendant:
OAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO., COUNTY BUILDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GROSS et al v. THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
G.S. PETER GROSS, D.O. and G.S. PETER GROSS, D.O., P.C.
Defendant:
THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY, FRED DIMEO and NANCY DIMEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
