Cases 11 - 20 of 217
Phelps v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
Kevin Phelps
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thacker v. Phelps et al
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dianne Thacker
Defendant:
Jody Phelps, Shauna, Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
as 2:2023cv01697
Petitioner:
Robert Phelps
Respondent:
Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Phelps
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Clay Scottbern and Clay Scothern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James Adams v. Kemp, et al
as 23-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW LIBRARIAN KEMP and A. PHELPS
Phelps v. Saginaw, City of et al
as 1:2023cv11020
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Phelps
Defendant:
Saginaw, City of, Fraternal Order of Police Associates, Ray Janni Lodge, Inc., Vincent Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Rodney Phelps
as 23-5315
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY SCOTT PHELPS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Adams #823706 v. Kemp et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
James Adams #823706
Defendant:
Unknown Kemp and A. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
