Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Fortucci v. Bunch et al
as 2:2019cv10169
Defendant:
Brian Bunch, Scott Phelps, Mark Benedettini and others
Plaintiff:
Fortucci and Stephen Fortucci
Enriquez-Perdomo v. Newman et al
as 3:2018cv00549
Defendant:
Ricardo A. Newman, Shawn Byers, John R. Korkin and others
Plaintiff:
Riccy Mabel Enriquez-Perdomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Phelps v. Engle
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
E. Galina Phelps
Defendant:
Kent D. Engle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Siebright et al
as 1:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Cory Phelps
Defendant:
Jody Siebright, Title IV-D Agency, Allegan County Deputy Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ali Al-Maqablh v. Crystal Heinz, et al
as 17-5532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALI AL-MAQABLH
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTAL L. HEINZ, KIM VITTITOW, Individually, and in their official capactiy as staff and attorney in the office of County Attorney of Trimble County, Ky., JAMES PHELPS, Individually, and as members of the Kentucky State Police Post 5 and others
Defendant:
TRIMBLE COUNTY KY, DAVID C. TRIMBLE, MATT WHALEN and others
Phelps v. Tuscarawas County, Ohio/Tuscarawas County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2016cv01936
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phelps
Defendant:
Tuscarawas County, Ohio/Tuscarawas County Board of Commissioners , Walt Wilson , J. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
