Cases 51 - 60 of 213
Evangelical Students Fellowship v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
as 1:2021cv02014
Plaintiff:
Evangelical Students Fellowship, Ann Phelps and Michael Phelps
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daudi Mwangangi v. Taylor Nielsen, et al
as 21-1577
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAUDI M. MWANGANGI
Defendant / Appellant:
TAYLOR NIELSEN, BEN PHELPS, FRANK NOLAND and others
Phelps, Michael v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Michael Phelps
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00424
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DAVID PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
ssa ogc and SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
Tammy Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phelps v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01710
Plaintiff:
Josephine Phelps
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Phelps et al
as 3:2020cv00980
Defendant:
Sylvia E. Phelps, Kevin M. Phelps and City of Murphysboro, Illinois
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Pramuk v. Phelps et al
as 3:2020cv00775
Plaintiff:
Susan E Pramuk and Susan G. E. Pramuk
Defendant:
Linda Cohen, Vicki Raftery, Lori Montalbano Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Illinois River Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
S Naber, Illinois River Correctional Center, . Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
