Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Cassie Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 22-6130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPPAHANOCK REGIONAL JAIL, PHIL GRIMES, Superintendent (Retired and REBECCA NORRIS, Administrator of the Estate of Houston Norris
Cassie Crisano v. Phil Grimes
as 21-6401
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT STOY, Rappahannock Regional Jail, RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, KEITH HUDSON, Superintendent, Rappahannock Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Crisano v. Grimes et al
as 1:2019cv01612
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Phil Grimes, Captain Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Cassie C Crisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. Meade et al
as 1:2019cv01571
Defendant:
Lorri Rohme, J Smith, Phil Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Russ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justin Russ v. Phil Grimes
as 19-7824
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT WAGNER, Medical Doctor, PETER OBER, Jail Physician (MD), PHIL GRIMES, Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. RUSS
Cassie Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 19-7294
Defendant / Appellee:
S. MONAGHON, Deputy, LORI RHOME, Major, STOY, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Russ v. Grimes et al
as 1:2019cv01002
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Mr Norris, Elliot Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
Justin M Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little John v. Grimes et al
as 1:2019cv00878
Defendant:
Superintendent Phil Grimes and Medical Supervisor Barbara Meade
Plaintiff:
Jason Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Grimes et al
as 3:2019cv00325
Defendant:
Phil Grimes and Barbra Meade
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Hayes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Mead et al
as 2:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Phil Grimes, Mrs. Simpson and Barbara Mead
Plaintiff:
Jason Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
