Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Makki v. Ross et al
as 2:2022cv10423
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Ali Makki
Defendant:
Philip Ross, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, MICAHEL PEMBERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
John Ross v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 21-13562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PHILIP ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
ROSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31254
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN PHILIP ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Philip Ross
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re Behr Process Corp.,
as CAC/8:17-cv-01016
Plaintiff:
Darin Richey , Aaron Amborn , Laurie McCall and others
Defendant:
Behr Process Corp. , Behr Paint Corp. , Masco Corp. and others
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-3405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Kettely Laraque, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as a memeber of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as a member of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
William Elger et al v. Behr Process Corporation et al
as 8:2017cv01100
Defendant:
Behr Paint Corp., Behr Process Corporation, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Elger and Philip Ross
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
JUN v. FORT LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv02803
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JUN
Defendant:
FORT LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT , BOROUGH OF FORT LEE , THOMAS O. RIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
