Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00027
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Renteria Villegas v. Valdez et al
as 6:2021cv00005
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez, Pete T Gaynor and Marc J Moore
Petitioner:
Maximo Renteria Villegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00057
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dixon
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Brent Reinke, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gortney v. Snider et al
as 5:2014cv01948
Plaintiff:
Heath Gortney
Defendant:
Michael Snider, Brian Alford, Phillip Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Valdez
as 1:2014cv02141
Plaintiff:
Andrew Phillip Valdez
Defendant:
Joyce Marie Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Camp
as 13-3085
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CAMP
Respondent:
SHELTON RICHARDSON, Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his official and individual capacity, PHILLIP VALDEZ, Former Assistant Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his individual capacity, KENNETH DAUGHERTY, Chief of Unit Management, CCA-Leavenworth, in his official and individual capacity and others
Camp v. Richardson, et al
as 13-3078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CAMP
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON, Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his official and individual capacity, PHILLIP VALDEZ, Former Assistant Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his individual capacity, KENNETH DAUGHERTY, Chief of Unit Management, CCA-Leavenworth, in his official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
