Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05885
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03343
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07561
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jesse Ontiveros v. United States
as 26-2729
Petitioner: Jesse Pina Ontiveros
Respondent: United States of America
Pina v. Merle
as 26-2399
Plaintiff: FREDERICK PINA
Defendant: Judge NATASHA C. MERLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02333
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv02599
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kula v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2026cv09879
Plaintiff: Christopher T. Kula
Defendant: City of Chicago, Jesse Brito, Rene Saldana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04590
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. BAR & GRILL TAMALEX LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05827
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant: BAR & GRILL TAMALEX LLC doing business as TAMALEX, TAKAO SAITO, MADAME SAITO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?