Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Eisele
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronnie Ramael Todd, Moor beneficiary Ramael Black Well El Trust a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal new yorker national, and Subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Brett Eisele, Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 et al.,, Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State et al.,, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security et al., and others
Ronnie Todd v. Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, et al
as 22-16329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD, RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
Atchley v. US Bank et al
as 2:2020cv01229
Defendant:
American Tower Corporation, US Bank, 2CA CV and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Atchley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempfling et al v. Stanford et al
as 2:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling
Defendant:
Amanda Stanford, Lynn Hurley and Pinal County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
