Cases 21 - 30 of 182
U.S. Bank v. Langley-Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank
Defendant:
Judy K Langley-Miller, Anthony Ravall, Lyndon Pita and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pita v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv20676
Plaintiff:
Jose Pita
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Morales Pita v. Garland
as 21-1318
Petitioner:
ISSAC MORALES PITA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Thomas v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2021cv01675
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Kern Valley State Prison, CDCR, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. Three Buddy's Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06142
Plaintiff:
Liliana Garcia and Araceli Garcia
Defendant:
Three Buddy's Inc. d/b/a Pita Olive and, Abul Kamal Pasha and Three Buddy's Inc. doing business as Pita Olive
Richard Lee Thomas v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 5:2021cv01913
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Kern Valley State Prison, CDCR, People of The State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santana v. Mama Pita LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Vicente Santana
Defendant:
Mama Pita LLC doing business as Mama Pita Mediterranean Grill, Bechara Harfouche and Ayaz Shaikh
Garcia et al v. PG Hospitality Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07968
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia and Epitacio Lira
Defendant:
PG Hospitality Inc. doing business as Mocha Burger UES, PitaGrillNYC Corp. doing business as Pita Grill, Khaled Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
