Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Pittman III v. Leidos, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Milford Maurice Pittman III
Defendant:
Leidos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
David Patterson v. David Spence
as 24-6205
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. PATTERSON
Defendant:
DAVID SPENCE, JUDGE HARRELL, DALLAS ROSE and others
Pittman v. Ohno
as 5:2024ct03036
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
Officer Ohno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Frederick v. Meagan Ramsey
as 24-6130
Plaintiff:
TERRY ANTOINE FREDERICK
Defendant:
MEAGAN RAMSEY, LT. TOMSON, LT. STINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023ct03279
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, L.B. Kelly and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
United States of America v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe, Betty Neill Guy-Parson, Margaret Ann Guy-Alligood and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Conyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04923
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Conyers, Robert Richardson, McIhael Frasure and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson v. Spence et al
as 5:2023ct03250
Plaintiff:
David A. Patterson
Defendant:
David Spence, Judge Harrell, Dallas Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023hc02168
Petitioner:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
