Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021at00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ProLite Building Supply, LLC, et al v. Ply Gem Windows, et al
as 17-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROLITE BUILDING SUPPLY, LLC, JOSHUA SANDERS, JOHN SATHER and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREAT LAKES WINDOW, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
PLY GEM WINDOWS, also known as MW Manufacturers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW B. JOHNSON and MICHAEL W. NEWMAN
Prolite Building Supply LLC et al v. Ply Gem Windows et al
as 2:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
Prolite Building Supply LLC , Joshua Sanders , John Sather and others
Defendant:
Ply Gem Windows and James Iverson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The Muhler Company, Inc. v. Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.
as 15-1843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE MUHLER COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
PLY GEM HOLDINGS, INCOPORATED, AWC HOLDING COMPANY, MW MANUFACTURERS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
PLY GEM WINDOW GROUP, MW WINDOWS & DOORS and GREAT LAKES WINDOWS
The Muhler Company, Inc. v. Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.
as 13-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE MUHLER COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
PLY GEM HOLDINGS, INCOPORATED, AWC HOLDING COMPANY, MW MANUFACTURERS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
PLY GEM WINDOW GROUP, MW WINDOWS & DOORS and GREAT LAKES WINDOWS
Muhler Company Inc, The v. Ply Gem Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00862
Defendant:
MW Manufacturers Inc, AWC Holding Company, MWM Holdings Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Muhler Company Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
