Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Toran Peterson v. Ravindra Polavarapu, et al
as 22-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TORAN V. PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAVINDRA POLAVARAPU, Psychiatrist
Defendant:
ESMAEIL EMAMI, Psychiatrist, CHRISTOPHER ZIMMERMAN, Psychologist, KATHERINE ZELL and others
Chaney v. Polavarapu et al
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Frank Chaney
Defendant:
Speedhar Polavarapu, Warden, FCI Beaumont and FNU Haskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Toran Peterson v. Ravindra Polavarapu, et al
as 21-1827
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TORAN V. PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAVINDRA POLAVARAPU, Psychiatrist, ESMAEIL EMAMI, Psychiatrist, CHRISTOPHER ZIMMERMAN, Psychologist and others
Garey v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00547
Defendant:
Clint Sonnier, Candice Jackson, Leonard Jones, . and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joyce v. Polavarapu et al
as 4:2020cv13211
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Susan L. Clark, Ashlee J. Hansinger and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric R Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyce #251901 v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 2:2020cv00208
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Susan L. Clark, Ashlee J. Hansinger and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric R. Joyce #251901
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponce v. Falls of Edgebrook, LP et al
as 4:2020cv02422
Plaintiff:
Andrea Ponce
Defendant:
Falls of Edgebrook, LP and Rao J. Polavarapu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dinkins v. Lara et al
as 1:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Shara Johnson, Frank Lara, Stephen Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Dinkins v. Frank Lara, et al
as 19-40809
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA MALLET, JOHN DOE, Chief of Psychology Department, SHARA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DINKINS
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, SHARON MILLER, Issam Harmoush and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
