Cases 1 - 10 of 554
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUBY v. GAINS et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY RUBY
Defendant:
RONNIE GAINS, NEW ALBANY POLICE DEPT., BRIDGET ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. University of Illinois Police Dept
as 2:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Faron Davenport
Defendant:
University of Illinois Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quansah v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv17185
Plaintiff:
Maria Quansah
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept. and Unknown 4 Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hart v. Chambers et al
as 1:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Bryant Hart
Defendant:
Jason Chambers, Joseph Moran, Matt Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Oak Forest Illinois Police Dept et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Shaune D Spivey
Defendant:
Oak Forest Illinois Police Dept, City of Oak Forest, Illinois, Officer Corder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRANBARGER v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2023cv02293
Plaintiff:
DALE C. TRANBARGER
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
