Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MERIS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GREENSBORO POLICE DEPT., A.B. MASTER CORPORAL MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
JENNIFER TALLEY, RENEE WARD, MEGAN M. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TURNER v. HIGH POINT POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2021cv00591
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
HIGH POINT POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. ALDRIDGE et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PETERSON
Defendant:
STANLEY COUNTY SHERRIF DEPT., A. L. ALDRIDGE and ALBEMARLE POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOBLEY v. ESTES et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
JASON DARNELL MOBLEY
Defendant:
B. D. ESTES, T. D. BROWN and GREENSBORO CITY POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER, LAMAR SKELTON, CONCORD POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLDER v. CABARRUS COUNTY POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. BOLDER
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOMBLE v. PRELIPP et al
as 1:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
COREY WOMBLE
Defendant:
CARRIE B. PRELIPP, G. C. GILLENWATER, ROBERT SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. MEISTER et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
EMILY JEFFORDS MEISTER, JAMES M. WEBB, JAMES S. PFAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
