Cases 21 - 30 of 151
Degenstein v. Hall
as 21-10098
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Milton Smith, Money Law Firm, L.L.C., Erin Nealy Cox, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Monique Degenstein
Cooper v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 2:2020cv05778
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia, Police Officer Smith, Police Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yolanda Banks-Reed, et al v. Joseph Mateu, III, et al
as 20-17085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YOLANDA BANKS-REED, individually, S.A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE, THE ESTATE OF SAHLEEM TINDLE, by and through its administrator LARON MAYFIELD and others
Defendant:
DOES, Bay Area Rapid Transit police officers DOES 1-50 inclusive, CARLOS ROJAS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department and BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a municipal corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH MATEU III, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department
Chen v. City & County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2020cv05578
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco and San Francisco Police Officers Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
Michael Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pedro Gomez Sanchez v. City of Santa Monica et al
as 2:2020cv06338
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gomez Sanchez and Pedro Gomez
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Police Officer Doe Jeters, City of Santa Monica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLARY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01906
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCLARY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3 and CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01803
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BOWMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMITER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01403
Plaintiff:
UHURU HAMITER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01329
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01071
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
