Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Glasswall, LLC v. AGC Flat Glass North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv21526
Plaintiff:
Glasswall, LLC
Defendant:
AGC Flat Glass North America, Inc. and POMA Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bond v. Wisconsin Hospitality Group et al
as 2:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brandy Bond
Defendant:
Wisconsin Hospitality Group, Michael Poma, Grand Avenue Mall LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Poma Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01225
Plaintiff:
Gerald Diaz
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc and Poma Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
6600 Suemac Place, LLC v. POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
6600 Suemac Place, LLC
Defendant:
POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Florida Acquisitions 1986, LLC v. POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
Florida Acquisitions 1986, LLC
Defendant:
POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2016cv13016
Plaintiff:
Jesse Young
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, R. Caldwell, Mary Velarde and others
Aldora Aluminum & Glass Produ v. Poma Glass & Specialty Windows
as 16-15358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALDORA ALUMINUM & GLASS PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
POMA GLASS & SPECIALTY WINDOWS, INC.
Pisa v. Poma et al
as 1:2015cv06211
Defendant:
Pacino's Inc. and Rosario Poma
Plaintiff:
Vincent Pisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
