Cases 1 - 10 of 77
LaGreca v. Davis et al
as 2:2025cv00192
Plaintiff:
Versace Pooh LaGreca
Defendant:
Brandon A Davis and Michael Mellow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Boykin (McLean)
as 25-1986
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOYKIN, PAUL ARLINE, JOSEPH MCLEAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arline v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2025cv00252
Plaintiff:
Reginald A Arline, Contessia, Tessa and others
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Frederick Davis, Jr and Officer D Sweet-Holston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baez v. Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08995
Defendant:
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jazlene Baez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
United States of America v. Boykin (Jacklyn)
as 24-1817
Defendant:
SEAN COTTON, ANTHONY BOYKIN, RAHSAAN MELVIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Vendetti
as 24-1212
Defendant:
ARLENE COMBS, DONALD R. GRIFFIN, RICO J. VENDETTI and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rojas v. DP Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Erick Rojas
Defendant:
DP Hospitality Group, LLC, Brookyln Chophouse Times Square,LLC, David Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lagreca v. Cotton et al
as 1:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Versace Pooh Lagreca
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jedidiah L. Cotton and Lieutenant Ashley Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Thomas
as 23-10905
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Drakorrin Thomas, also known as Pooh, also known as Drakorrien Thomas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
