Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Patel-Chludzinski v. Poole, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Roshani Patel-Chludzinski
Defendant:
Poole, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Caratozzolo v. Wallenpaupek Lake Estates Property et al
as 3:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Stephen Caratozzolo
Defendant:
Wallenpaupek Lake Estates Property, Wallenpaupek Lake Estates Property Owners Association and Premier Pool Renovations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Moreno v. Cardinal Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Joe Moreno
Defendant:
Cardinal Systems, Inc. and Fox Pools of York, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Poole v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2021cv00201
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Poole
Defendant:
Kelly Pelcher, Robert J. Schmidt, Brian Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Santiago v. Smith et al
as 4:2020cv01274
Defendant:
Sgt. Poole, S. Wiggins and Barry Smith
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accelevate 2020, LLC et al v. Boockvar et al
as 1:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Joe Richard Pool and Accelevate 2020, LLC
Defendant:
Kathryn Boockvar and Jonathan Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2019cv00904
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Poole
Defendant:
Kelly Pelcher, Robert J. Schmidt, Brian Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Livanova Deutschland GMBH et al
as 1:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
Bernard Poole
Defendant:
Livanova Deutschland GMBH and LivaNova Holding USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
