Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Nussbaum v. Porch.com, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Paul Nussbaum
Defendant:
Porch.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Residential Warranty Services, Inc. et al v. Porch.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Residential Warranty Services, Inc. and P. Nathan Thornberry
Defendant:
Porch.com, Inc. and Porch Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LIBERTI et al v. PORCH.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03816
Plaintiff:
PAUL LIBERTI and SUZANNE LIBERTI
Defendant:
PORCH.COM, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathan Chennette, et al v. Porch.com, Inc., et al
as 20-35962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE ROBB, NATHAN CHENNETTE, SCOTT GLUBAY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENTON MARRELLI, MATTHEW EHRLICHMAN, GOSMITH INC. and others
David Fiedler et al v. Porchcom, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05736
Defendant:
PORCH.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, MATTHEW EHRLICHMAN, Does 1-20, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Eli Gordon and David Fiedler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kandela, LLC v. Porch.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05383
Defendant:
Does 1-20, inclusive, Porch.com, Inc. and Matthew Ehrlichman
Plaintiff:
Kandela, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
