Cases 1 - 10 of 18
POULOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14824
Plaintiff:
DANNY JAY POULOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poulos et al v. Cinemark USA Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04556
Plaintiff:
Michael Poulos and Suzanne Poulos
Defendant:
Cinemark USA Inc., Cinemark Holdings, Inc, Cinemark Leasing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POULOS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22992
Plaintiff:
PHILIP JOHN POULOS JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POULOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61233
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL POULOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poulos v. Brickley Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02629
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Brickley Enterprises, LLC, Brickley Holdings Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Poulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. GARABEDIAN et al
as 2:2019cv01539
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL GARABEDIAN, MITCHELL GARABEDIAN and KURTIS N. POULOS
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez-Zapata et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pignataro, Catherine Phillips, Michael Potts and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Poulos v. United States Postal Service et. al.
as 1:2017cv12576
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Poulos
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Kenwood Organization, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poulos et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2013cv15044
Plaintiff:
Teresa Poulos and Robert Kish
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poulos v. Best Western-Cooperstown
as 3:2012cv01886
Plaintiff:
William Poulos
Defendant:
Best Western-Cooperstown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
