Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Boyd v. Miles City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Banner Boyd
Defendant:
Miles City Police Dept., Ryan Ketchum, Jesse Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilton et al v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 4:2022cv07697
Plaintiff:
Barry Gilton, Ali Gilton, Barry Gilton, Jr. and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Damon Jackson, Reese Burrows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arthur Prelle v. Chief Executive Officer Of New Jersey, et al
as 22-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT PRELLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, By Arthur Scott Prelle and TRUSTEES FOR RE789806284US-0022
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Harris v. Prell
as 1:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Sydney Harris
Defendant:
JOSHUA PRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Barry Gilton
as 20-10344
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY GILTON, AKA Prell
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Barry Gilton
as 20-10269
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY GILTON, AKA Prell
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1052
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Prelle et al v. GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2019cv20575
Defendant:
GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation and GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kurt Prelle and Ximena Prelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
