Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Mark Lloyd v. Procter & Gamble Disability, et al
as 20-4329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK LLOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
PROCTER & GAMBLE LONG TERM DISABILITY ALLOWANCE POLICY PLAN, PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY COMMITTEE and PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN, Plan #501
Lloyd v. The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan
as 1:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mark Lloyd
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan , The Procter & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy Plan and The Procter & Gamble Disability Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN v. ROGERS
as 1:2016cv00561
Plaintiff:
PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
SUSAN ANNE ROGERS
Counter_defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE LONG-TERM DISABILITY ALLOWANCE POLICY, THE , THE PROCTER & GAMBLE OPTIONAL DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN and PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN
Counter_claimant:
SUSAN ANNE ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hagins v. Procter & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy, The
as 0:2013cv01607
Plaintiff:
John T Hagins, Sr
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nichols v. Procter & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy
as 4:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Randy Nichols
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
