Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Calbart v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Ernie Lee Calbart
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holding Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEVITAN v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2014cv00603
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J LEVITAN
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and BP PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prozer v. Roderick et al
as 3:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Prozer, III
Defendant:
Brande Roderick, Glann Cadrez, Financially Hung Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Michael Anthony Prozer v. Brande Roderick et al
as 2:2014cv02222
Defendant:
Glenn Cadrez, Financially Hung Inc., Law Offices of Kristen Rayder Young and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Prozer, III
Maryland et al v. Moxley et al
as 3:2013cv01751
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Maryland, Joanne Elizabeth Busch, Hollywood Helpers, Inc. and others
Defendant:
R. Scott Moxley, Gustavo Arellano and OC Weekly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales v. Harpo Productions, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01110
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
Harpo Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cole v. Roark et al
as 3:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Adrian Cole
Defendant:
Sandy Roark , Tonya Zimmerman , Diantha Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. ROARK et al
as 1:2011cv01570
Defendant:
DIANTHA BRADLEY, PEN PRODUCTS, INC., SANDY ROARK and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGESS v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID B. WILLIAMS, JAMIE MINOR, EQUITY BASED SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. Grant et al
as 0:2011cv60399
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Calhoun
Defendant:
Eddie Grant, Langley Production, Inc, James White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
