Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Federal National Mortgage v. Woodroffe et al
as 8:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage and Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Rhema Progressive Inc., Rhyma Progressive Inc. and Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NIEVES v. PROGRESSIVE, INC.
as 2:2019cv01061
Plaintiff:
MARIA NIEVES
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Woodroffe et al v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 8:2018cv01614
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage and JP Morgan Chase
Plaintiff:
Rhema Progressive Inc. and Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosier v. Forward Progress, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation
as 9:2017cv80758
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rosier
Defendant:
Forward Progress, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tarlton et al v. Duke Energy Progress, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc00017
Plaintiff:
Lester T Tarlton and Tammy Tarlton
Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. and Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Respondent:
Strategic Comp., a Division of Great American Insruance Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv80548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
United States of America v. Nemeth et al
as 6:2016cv06170
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Katherine A. Nemeth, Tri County Housing Council, Community Progress Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
